Yesterday I
attended a meeting at Liverpool County Court with advisers, lawyers and Senior
Judiciary. This was all about the growing problem of how we can best assist Litigants
in Person.
When the
government announced its devastating cuts to Legal Aid in 2013 many of us
predicted a massive growth in the number of those bringing or defending cases without any
legal representation. In a report in 2011 the Civil Justice Council said –
‘It is a
reality that those who cannot afford legal services and those for whom the
state will not provide legal aid comprise the larger part of the population of England and Wales. Thus for most members of the
public who become involved in legal proceedings they will have to represent themselves.’
Access to Justice for Litigants in Person 2011.
What this
does not say is that such litigants will often be opposed by public bodies or
insurers with very deep pockets to pay expensive legal fees. And the legal
process is more than just a maze. It is a minefield.
These
unrepresented litigants are increasingly dependant on help from court staff who
themselves have seen cuts in funding and can, in any event, only do so much. The burden is
also taken on by voluntary agencies. They do a stalwart job. One advice worker
in Liverpool advises hundreds of people facing
debt cases virtually on her own and with diminishing resources. I have said
before that Access to Advice at this level is a waste land –
The
government has deprived ordinary people of the right to funded legal advice
and, at the same time, squeezed the life out of those other agencies that were
able to help. There are many solicitors and barristers who will advise
litigants without charge. But in a climate of heavily reduced fees and record
closures of law firms, there is only so much that they can do.
The problem
has recently been summed up by the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas –
“…lawyers
should not forget that in the present day litigation seems almost out of reach
for those on modest incomes and many SMEs”.’
Lord Thomas hopes that a move towards fixed legal fees might
improve the situation. Alongside this there is the move towards unbundled legal
services whereby legal advice and help is provided at key stages throughout a
case at a fixed charge –
I’m afraid
that I do not share his optimism. For those on lowest incomes, including some who
are very vulnerable even a fixed fee is way beyond their reach.
What we
need is a firm commitment from politicians to a reinstatement of properly
funded legal assistance to those in greatest need.
There is no point in having
a justice system if people do not have access to that system regardless of
wealth. This needs to be brought to the top of the agenda as we move towards a
2015 election.
I dont think there is any way I could disagree with you on this Steve.
ReplyDeleteJustice is far from done when it is only for the rich. I certainly am unable to pay legal fees on my current income therefore am largely excluded from the legal system. Yet, as I think you say, this government are making matters even worse
This government is composed of people who are too wealthy to understand or care.
ReplyDelete