Here’s a
question – what would you think if this came up on your twitter timeline?
"Crap! Robin Hood airport is closed. You've got a week
and a bit to get your shit together otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky
high!!"
Would you sympathise with the frustration of a delayed
traveler or would you see it as a real threat of a terrorist attack? Well to
anyone with a bit of common sense the answer is obvious.
Sadly that has not been the case for the unfortunate Paul
Chambers who tweeted that statement back in 2010. He was charged and convicted
of sending a public electronic message that was "..of an indecent, obscene or
menacing character contrary to the Communications Act 2003". He was
duly fined and ordered to pay the costs. And he does now have a criminal record.
I have gone on before about the need to be careful what we
tweet. There can be severe consequences for those think that they can send
grossly offensive material from the safety of their own homes –
But this
case really makes our criminal justice system look a bit ridiculous. Would any
reasonable person reading those words consider them to add up to a menacing
threat?
Mr.
Chambers’ case is before the Appeal Courts today –
His case
has generated a lot of media interest mainly because of the celebrities who
have backed him; including Stephen Fry and Jonathan Ross.
Let’s hope
that the judges see the distinction between the sort of conduct from which we
need to be protected and what is really an ill-judged joke!
Not so sure I agree with you Steve, on this one. These reactions always seem a bit over the top in the cold light of day,but airport security is rather important and I would prefer a uniform draconian response in the face of such threats; after all there is the problem of 'real' threats being couched in such outlandish and querky terms that they would be ignored ! And furthermore I am taking a long haul flight myself in a couple of months I want to feel safe at the Airport and in the air!
ReplyDeletecjb